Toward a Metanarrative of Postmodernity. Philippe Portier on Religious Thought and Social Science in the Post-Secular Era. Article Review: Portier P. (2025) Pensée religieuse et sciences sociales en régime de post-sécularité. Une analyse à partir d’un “grand récit” sociologique. Recherches de Science Religieuse. Vol. 113. No. 3. P. 492―505. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsr.253.0092

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.3.3404

Keywords:

religious thought, social science, postsecular era, postmodernity, dialogue between religion and secular society

Abstract

This review analyzes the main points of the article by renowned French political scientist and sociologist Philippe Portier, “Religious Thought and Social Sciences in a Post-Secular Era.” His analysis, based on a sociological “metanarrative,” (Pensée religieuse et sciences sociales en régime de post-sécularité. Une analyse à partir d’un “grand récit” sociologique.) is an important source for understanding the current state of social science on religion. Contemporary society is developing in a post-secular environment that does not abolish secularization, but is characterized by a complex interaction and interpenetration of religious and secular principles in public space. By revisiting the concepts of analyzing religion in contemporary society in its multi-layered connection with other social institutions, Philippe Portier's approach represents an important step toward a contemporary understanding of the role of religion in modern society. The limitation of Philippe Portier's analysis to interactions with the Catholic Church precludes his assessment of religious diversity even in this region, but leaves room for further research on this issue.

Author Biography

Sergey V. Trophimov, Lomnosov Moscow State University

  • Lomnosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology of Mass Communications, Faculty of Journalism

References

Узланер Д. А. Постсекулярный поворот. Как мыслить о религии в XXI веке. М: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2020.

Uslaner D. (2020) Postsecular Turn: How to Think About Religion in the 21st Century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute. (In Russ.)

Calhoun C. J., Wieviorka M. (2015) Manifeste pour les Sciences Sociales. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (MSH).

Ferry J.-M. (2013) Les Lumières de la religion: entretien avec Élodie Maurot. Paris: Bayard.

Habermas J. (2000) Globalism, Ideology and Traditions: Interview with Jurgen Habermas by Johann Arnason. Thesis Eleven. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 1―10.

Habermas J. (2001) Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hope K. W. (1976) Film & Meta-narrative. Dissertation Abstracts International. Vol. 36. P. 4814A.

Lonergan B. (1972) Method in Theology. London: Darton, Longamn & Todd.

Lyotard J-.F. (1979) La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir éditions. Paris: de Minuit.

Koussens D. (2023) Secularism(s) in Contemporary France: Law, Policy, and Religious Diversity. Cham Springer: Switzerland.

Portier P. (2025) Pensée religieuse et sciences sociales en régime de post-sécularité. Une analyse à partir d’un “grand récit” sociologique. Recherches de Science Religieuse. Vol. 113. No. 3. P. 492―505. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsr.253.0092.

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Trophimov, S. V. (2026). Toward a Metanarrative of Postmodernity. Philippe Portier on Religious Thought and Social Science in the Post-Secular Era. Article Review: Portier P. (2025) Pensée religieuse et sciences sociales en régime de post-sécularité. Une analyse à partir d’un “grand récit” sociologique. Recherches de Science Religieuse. Vol. 113. No. 3. P. 492―505. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsr.253.0092. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.3.3404