Online Social Media Consumption in a Turbulent Society: The Case of Russia 2022–2024

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.2.3008

Keywords:

social media, audience measurement, user-generated content, access blocking, online communications, social turbulence

Abstract

The article analyses the dynamics of the audience of online social media in Russia from January 2022 to September 2024. The study is based on statistical data coming from two sources, namely, Mediascope’s Cross Web online audience measurement and Medialogia’s monitoring of user-generated content (UGC). The author proposes two indexes for solving comparative tasks, Dynamic Structural Index and Dynamic Integral Index. The following analysis made it possible to identify different audience effects for platforms subject to slowdowns and blocking by regulators, as well as for media outlets that continue to operate without restrictions. The author examines the reasons for the growth of Telegram's audience—the only major beneficiary of the changes in the social media landscape that occurred during the period under study—and notes the failure of attempts to introduce new domestic platforms to the market as part of the import substitution policy by September 2024. The analyzed case is introduced into the broader context of international conflicts related to the management of UGC online platforms, as well as the theoretical context of understanding the phenomenon of online social communications at the current stage of development.

Acknowledgements. This publication was prepared in the course of research No. 25-00-004, “A study of digital ecosystems as new entities in the media communications industry and elements of the national media system (based on the Yandex and VK cases),” within the framework of the Scientific Foundation of the HSE University program.

The author expresses his sincere gratitude to his colleagues who made the research possible: S. Alibekov and K. Zendrikov (Internet Initiatives Development Fund), I. Zadorin and A. Saponova (ZIRCON), M. Macheret (Medialogia), I. Shpuntova and V. Manuilova (Mediascope), A. Tyshetskaya, S. Vartanov, E. Yarskaya-Smirnova, and I. Zangieva (HSE University).

 

Author Biography

Sergey G. Davydov, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci (Philos.), Senior Researcher at the International Laboratory of Social Integration Research
    • Analyst at the International Laboratory of Applied Network Research

References

Гуркина О. А., Мальцева Д. В. Мотивы использования виртуальных социальных сетей подростками // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 5. С. 123―130.

Gurkina O. A., Maltseva D. V. (2015) Adolescents’ Motivations to Use Virtual Social Networking Sites. Sociological Studies. No. 5. P. 123―130. (In Russ.)

Данина М. М., Шаляпин А. А. Социально-психологический аспект исследования социальных сетей в Интернете // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 10: Журналистика. 2012. № 3. С. 16―33.

Danina M. M., Shalyapin A. A. (2012) Socio-Psychological Approach to the Research of Online Social Networks. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika. No. 3. P. 16―33. (In Russ.)

Звоновский В. Б., Ходыкин А. В. Российское общественное мнение в условиях военного конфликта, 2022―2023. Кишинев: Historical Expertise, 2024.

Zvonovsky V. B., Khodykin A. V. (2024) Russian Public Opinion in the Context of Military Conflict, 2022―2023. Chisinau: Historical Expertise. (In Russ.)

Зубофф Ш. Эпоха надзорного капитализма. Битва за человеческое будущее на новых рубежах власти. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2022.

Zuboff S. (2022) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontiers of Power. Moscow: Gaidar Institute. (In Russ.)

Минина В. Н., Василькова В. В. От социального пространства к пространству онлайн социальных сетей: исследовательские подходы и вызовы // Социальное пространство. 2019. № 5. Ст. 10.

Minina V. N., Vasilkova V. V. (2019) From Social Space to the Space of Online Social Networks: Research Approaches and Challenges. Social Space. No. 5. Art. 10. (In Russ.)

Моросанова А. А. Социальные сетевые медиа и цифровые платформы в новых условиях: quo vadis? // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 6: Экономика. 2022. № 4. С. 39―63.

Morosanova A. A. (2022) Social Media and Digital Platformism New Conditions: Quo Vadis? Lomonosov Economics Journal. No. 4. P. 39―63. (In Russ.)

Поланьи К. Великая трансформация: политические и экономические истоки нашего времени. СПб.: Алетейя, 2002.

Polanyi K. (2002) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russ.)

Сулейманова Л. В. Конструирование женственности в дискурсе социальных сетевых медиа (на примере Instagram*) // Общество: социология, психология, педагогика. 2017. № 1. C. 37―42.

Suleimanova L. V. (2017) Construction of Femininity in the Social Media Discourse (Case Study of Instagram*). Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. No. 1. P. 37―42. (In Russ.)

Ушкин С. Г. Влияние виртуальных социальных сетей на протестную активность в российском обществе: дисс. … канд. социол. наук. Саранск, 2015.

Ushkin S. G. (2015) The Impact of Virtual Social Networks on Protest Activity in Russian Society. PhD Dissertation in Sociology. Saransk. (In Russ.)

Чэнь Ди. Социальные сетевые медиа и социальные сети в концепциях американских и российских исследователей // Вестник СПбГУ. 2012. Сер. 9. Филология. Востоковедение. Журналистика. Вып. 3. С. 223―230.

Chen Di. (2012) Concepts of American and Russian Researchers in Online Social Media and Social Networking. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 9. No. 3. P. 223―230. (In Russ.)

Ядов В. А. Каким мне видится будущее социологии // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 4. С. 3―7.

Yadov V. A. (2012) How I See the Future of Sociology. Sociological Studies. No. 4. P. 3―7. (In Russ.)

Aaronson S. A. (2019) What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism? World Trade Review. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 541―577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745618000198.

Aaronson S. A. (2024) Trade Agreements and Cross-Border Disinformation: Patchwork or Polycentric? In: Aguerre C., Campbell-Verduyn M., Scholte J.A. (eds.) Global Digital Data Governance. London: Routledge. P. 125-147.

Heller K. J. (2021) In Defense of Pure Sovereignty in Cyberspace. International Law Studies. Vol. 97. P. 1432―1499.

Mejias U. A., Couldry N. (2024) Data Grab: The New Colonialism of Big Tech and How to Fight Back. London: WH Allen.

Mueller M. L. (2020) Against Sovereignty in Cyberspace. International Studies Review. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 779―801. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz044.

Musiani F. (2022) Infrastructuring Digital Sovereignty: A Research Agenda for an Infrastructure-Based Sociology of Digital Self-Determination Practices. Information, Communication and Society. Vol. 25. No. 6. P. 785―800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2049850.

Fernandez-Garcia C .E., Gamboa S. G., Castillo P. G. (2025) Digital Imperialism: Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence, International Security, Information Flows, and Social Media in the Twenty-First Century. In: Roumate F., La Rosa E. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence, Media and International Security. The Weaponization of AI Use in Media and International Security. Cham: Springer. P. 35―58.

Safko L., Brake D. K. (2009) The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools and Strategies for Business Success. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Published

2026-05-10

How to Cite

Davydov, S. G. (2026). Online Social Media Consumption in a Turbulent Society: The Case of Russia 2022–2024. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (2), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2026.2.3008

Issue

Section

SOCIOLOGY OF THE INTERNET