Myths and Beliefs about Microchip-Implants in Russia, Ukraine and Slovenia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.3.2122

Keywords:

medical microchip, microchip implant, RFID microchip, COVID-19, population mass survey, comparative study, cross-country study

Abstract

The article presents the main results of an international research project on studying the attitudes of the population to new electronic devices — passive RFID microchips (Radio Frequency IDentification, radio frequency identification) implanted into the human body to implement certain functionality. The study examined the level of awareness of RFID microchips, ideas about their potential benefits and associated threats, and the main myths associated with their implementation, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected through mass population surveys on a quota sample in three EU countries, Russia and Ukraine. The text compares representations of RFID microchips of residents of three countries — Russia, Ukraine, and Slovenia. It is shown that the awareness of RFID technology is relatively low in all countries, even though in Slovenia, a share of the population who knows about the technology is larger than in Russia and Ukraine. Microchip implants are strongly associated with tracking and control tools. Residents of all three countries believe that tracking digital traces is the least attractive option for using implant microchips in the context of the pandemic, while the identification of vaccinated, recovered, and sick people is assessed positively.

 

Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program. We express our deep gratitude to our colleagues from “Aventica” Kirill Nepomnyashchii and Laura Bedredinova for the help with data collection in Russia.

 

 

Author Biographies

Stanislav P. Moiseev, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Analyst at the International Laboratory for Applied Network Research, HSE University
  • Aventica LLC, Moscow, Russia
    • Head of Research and Consulting

Tamara Ye. Shcheglova, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Junior Research Fellow at the International Laboratory for Applied Network Research

Daria V. Maltseva, HSE University

  • HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Leading Research Fellow and Deputy Head at the International Laboratory for Applied Network Research

Anja Žnidaršič, University of Maribor

  • University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
    • PhD, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences

Alenka Baggia, University of Maribor

  • University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
    • PhD, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences

Borut Werber, University of Maribor

  • University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
    • PhD, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences

Vanja Bevanda, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula

  • Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Pula, Croatia
    • PhD, Professor at the Faculty of Economics and Tourism named by Dr. Mijo Mirković

References

Bhuptani M., Moradpour Sh. (2005) RFID Field Guide: Deploying Radio Frequency Identification Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.

Evanega S., Lynas M., Adams J., Smolenyak K. (2020) Coronavirus Misinformation: Quantifying Sources and Themes in the COVID-19 “Infodemic”. Cornell Alliance for Science Working Paper. URL: https://allianceforscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evanega-et-al-Coronavirus-misinformation-submitted_07_23_20.pdf (accessed: 29.05.2023).

Hu T., Wang S., Luo W., Zhang M., Huang X., Yan Y., Liu R., Ly K., Kacker V., She B., Li Z. (2021) Revealing Public Opinion towards COVID-19 Vaccines with Twitter Data in the United States: A Spatiotemporal Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research. Vol. 23. No. 9. Art. e30854. https://doi.org/10.2196/30854.

Hudson J., Caplanova A., Novak M. (2015) Public Attitudes to GM Foods. The Balancing of Risks and Gains. Appetite. Vol. 92. P. 303—313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.031.

Kim S., Choi S.-O., Wang J. (2014) Individual Perception vs. Structural Context: Searching for Multilevel Determinants of Social Acceptance of New Science and Technology Across 34 Countries. Science and Public Policy. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 44—57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct032.

Werber B., Žnidaršič A. (2015) The Use of Subcutaneous RFID Microchip in Health Care — A Willingness to Challenge. Health and Technology. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 57—65. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12553-015-0105-3.

Werber B., Baggia A., Žnidaršič A. (2017) Behaviour Intentions to Use RFID Subcutaneous Microchips: A Cross-Sectional Slovenian Perspective. In: Pucihar A., Kljajić Borštnar M., Kittl C., Ravesteijn P., Clarke R., Bons R. (eds.) Digital Transormation — Form Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives: (Conference Proceedings) / 30th Bled eConference, (June 18—21, 2017, Bled, Slovenia). Maribor: University of Maribor Press. P. 669—684. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-043-1.47.

Werber B., Baggia A., Žnidaršič A. (2018) Factors Affecting the Intentions to Use RFID Subcutaneous Microchip Implants for Healthcare Purposes. Organizacija. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 121—133. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-0010.

Žnidaršič A., Baggia A., Pavlíček A., Fischer J., Rostański M, Werber B. (2021) Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Cross-sectional Study. Organizacija. Vol. 54. No. 4. P. 275—292. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0019.

Published

2023-07-07

How to Cite

Moiseev С. П., Shcheglova Т. Е., Maltseva Д. В., Žnidaršič А., Baggia А., Werber Б., & Bevanda В. (2023). Myths and Beliefs about Microchip-Implants in Russia, Ukraine and Slovenia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes (ISSN 2219-5467), (3). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.3.2122

Issue

Section

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES