Deputies of the United Russia and CPRF Fractions in the State Duma: A Comparative Analysis of Careers after Leaving Office

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.4.2248

Keywords:

deputies, United Russia, KPRF, career, business, administration, State Duma

Abstract

The article analyses careers of the deputies of the United Russia and the Communist Party (CPRF) factions after leaving the State Duma. Empirically, the study bases on the biographical database of the State Duma of the 4th, 5th, and 6th convocations. The study revealed significant inter-factional differences in the deputies’ post-career trajectories. United Russia members are more likely to move to administrative bodies (usually to elite positions) and business (a noticeable minority is part of the national economic elite). Communists more often work in the apparatus of representative bodies and in regional legislatures, election to which remains their main opportunity to maintain power status and belonging to the elite after leaving the State Duma. In general, the post-career of Communist Party deputies has a more pronounced political accent than that of the legislators from United Russia. Factional career differences might probably occur due to the ideology and place of the parties in the political system. In addition, the features of the post-career of the deputies of both parties are largely related to their professional experience before entering the State Duma. Finally, the age of retirement from the State Duma partly explains the career differences between the factions. The work of deputies from United Russia in administrative bodies and commercial organizations after leaving parliamentary positions contributes to the convergence of the party's policy with the interests of these structures. The relative rarity of such transitions among the deputies of the Communist Party, on the contrary, might indicate the autonomization of its policy from the corresponding interests.

Author Biography

Denis B. Tev, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS

  • Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia
    • Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Senior Researcher

References

Быстрова А.С., Дука А.В., Колесник Н.В., Невский А.В., Тев Д.Б. Российские региональные элиты: инновационный потенциал в контексте глобализации // Глобализация в российском обществе: сб. науч. трудов / отв. ред. И.И. Елисеева. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2008. С. 99-242.

Bystrova A.S., Duka A.V., Kolesnik N.V., Nevskij A.V., Tev D.B. (2008) Russian Regional Elites: Innovation Potential in the Context of Globalization. In: Eliseeva I.I. (ed.) Globalization in Russian Society: Collection of Scientific Works. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija. P. 99-242. (In Russ.)

Гаман-Голутвина О.В. Российский парламентаризм в исторической ретроспективе и сравнительной перспективе (II) // Полис. Политические исследования. 2006. № 3. С. 67—74. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.03.06.

Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2006) Russian Parliamentarism in Historical Retrospective and Comparative Perspective (II). Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 67—74. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.03.06. (In Russ.)

Коргунюк Ю.Г. Финансирование партий в постсоветской России: между бизнесом и властью // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз (Журнал политической философии и социологии политики). 2010. № 3—4. С. 87—120. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2010-5859-3-87-120.

Korgunjuk Yu.G. (2010) Financing of Parties in Post-soviet Russia: Between Business and Government. The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia. No. 3—4. P. 87—120. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2010-5859-3-87-120. (In Russ.)

Макаренко Б.И. Партийная система России в 2008 году // Ежегодный доклад ИнОП «Оценка состояния и перспектив политической системы Российской Федерации в 2008 году — начале 2009 года». 2009. URL: http://www.inop.ru/files/Chapter12.pdf (дата обращения: 14.05.2022).

Makarenko B.I. (2009) The party system of Russia in 2008. Annual report of the InOP “Assessment of the state and prospects of the political system of Russian Federation in 2008 — early 2009”. URL: http://www.inop.ru/files/Chapter12.pdf (accessed: 14.05.2022). (In Russ.)

Тев Д.Б. Региональный депутатский корпус партий «второго эшелона»: сравнительный анализ бассейна рекрутирования парламентариев КПРФ, «Справедливой России» и ЛДПР // Властные структуры и группы доминирования: Материалы десятого Всероссийского семинара «Социологические проблемы институтов власти в условиях российской трансформации» / под ред. А.В. Дуки. СПб.: Интерсоцис, 2012. С. 52—75.

Tev D.B. (2012) Regional Deputy Corps of the “Second Echelon” Parties: A Comparative Analysis of the Pool of Recruitment of Parliamentarians of CPRF, “A Just Russia” and LDPR. In: Duka A.V. (ed.). Power Structures and Domination Groups: Proceedings of the Tenth All-Russian Seminar “Sociological Problems of Power Institutions in the Conditions of Russian Transformation”. Saint Petersburg: Intersocis. P. 52—75. (In Russ.)

Тев Д.Б. Депутаты Государственной Думы РФ VI созыва: социально-профессиональные источники рекрутирования // Экономическая социология. 2017. Т. 18. № 5. С. 52-86. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2017-5-52-86.

Tev D.B. (2017) Deputies of the State Duma of the VI Convocation: Social-Professional Sources of Recruitment. Journal of Economic Sociology. Vol. 18. No. 5. P. 52-86. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2017-5-52-86. (In Russ.)

Тев Д.Б. Депутаты Государственной Думы РФ: особенности карьеры после прекращения полномочий // Социологическое обозрение. 2018. Т. 17. № 1. С. 106-133. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2018-1-106-133.

Tev D.B. (2018) Deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation: Career Characteristics after the Termination of Office. Russian Sociological Review. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 106-133. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2018-1-106-133. (In Russ.)

Baturo A., Arlow J. (2017) Is There a ‘Revolving Door’ to the Private Sector in Irish Politics? Irish Political Studies. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1365709.

Byrne C. Theakston K. (2016) Leaving the House: The Experience of Former Members of Parliament Who Left the House of Commons in 2010. Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 69. No. 3. P. 686-707. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv053.

Claessen C., Bailer S. (2015) What Happens After? An Analysis of Post-Parliamentary Private Sector Career Positions in Germany and the Netherlands. Paper prepared for the workshop „Institutional Determinants of Legislative Coalition Management”, 16-19 November 2015, Tel Aviv University, Israel. URL: https://www.sv.uio.no/isv/english/research/projects/evolution-parliamentarism/events/seminars/claessenbailerwhathappensafter.pdf (accessed: 29.03.2022).

Cotta M., Best H. (eds) (2007) Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eggers A.C., Hainmueller J. (2009) MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics. American Political Science Review. Vol. 103. No. 4. P. 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990190.

Flikke G. (1999) Patriotic Left-Centrism: The Zigzags of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 275—298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139999038.

Gelman V. (2005) Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species? Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 226-246. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.21.3.226.

Gill G. (2012) The Decline of a Dominant Party and the Destabilization of Electoral Authoritarianism? Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 449-471. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.28.4.449.

Golosov G.V. (2011) The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.566427.

Hutcheson D.S. (2012) Party Finance in Russia. East European Politics. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.689978.

Kynev A. (2022) The Changing Demographics of the State Duma from Betting on Electoral Support to Intra-Elite Intrigues. Free Russia Foundation, 2022. URL: https://www.4freerussia.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/05/duma21en.pdf (accessed: 27.05.2022).

Makarenko B.I. (2012) The Post-Soviet Party of Power. Russian Politics & Law. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 54-83. https://doi.org/10.2753/RUP1061-1940500103.

March L. (2002) The Communist Party in Post-Soviet Russia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Perepechko A.S., ZumBrunnen C., Kolossov V.A. (2011) Organization and Institutionalization of Russia’s Political Parties in 1905—1917 and 1993—2007: Similarities and Differences from Two Occidentalist Periods. Party Politics. Vol. 17. No. 5. P. 581—609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810374744.

Prewitt K., Nowlin W. (1969) Political Ambitions and the Behavior of Incumbent Politicians. Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 298—308. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591296902200204.

Reuter O.J. (2017) The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts S.P. (2012) United Russia and the Dominant-party Framework: Understanding the Russian Party of Power in Comparative Perspective. East European Politics. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.684754.

Quaresirria F., Santolini R., Fiorillo F. (2020) Political Affiliation in Post-Parliamentary Careers in Italian Public Enterprises. German Economic Review. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-0016-0019.

Sakwa R. (1998) Left or Right? The CPRF and the Problem of Democratic Consolidation in Russia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 14. No. 1-2. P. 128-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279808415372.

Samuels D. (2003) Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slider D. (2010) How United is United Russia? Regional Sources of Intra-party Conflict. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523271003712617.

Wilson K. (2007) Party Finance in Russia: Has the 2001 Law «On Political Parties» Made a Difference? Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 59. No. 7. P. 1089—1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130701607094.

Würfel M. (2017) Life After the Bundestag: An Analysis of the Post-Parliamentary Careers of German MPs. German Politics. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1344642.

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

Tev Д. Б. (2023). Deputies of the United Russia and CPRF Fractions in the State Duma: A Comparative Analysis of Careers after Leaving Office. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (4). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.4.2248

Issue

Section

SOCIOLOGY OF LABOR, ORGANIZATIONS AND PROFESSIONS